Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score and Brainstem Sign Score Application to Predict Mortality of Patients with Severe Head Injuries at Gambiran Public Hospital of Kediri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26699/jnk.v7i3.ART.p426-431Keywords:
FOUR score, Brainstem Sign Score, Prognosis, Severe head injuryAbstract
There are many factors and variables that influence the prognosis in patients with severe head injuries make determining the prognosis for patients with severe head injuries become difficult. There are two parameters that can predict the prognosis of severe head injury patients with optimal full outline of unresponsiveness score (FOUR score) and brainstem sign score (BSS). FOUR scores can provide a wealth of information about the scale of neurological signs that are quick and easy used for unconcious patients. BSS is an assessment to predict the death of a person permanently to determine whether there is a physiological function that is not function normally. The aimed of this study was to determine ratio of FOUR score and BSS in determining the prognosis of patients with severe head injury at RSUD Gambiran Kediri. The type of study was cross sectional approach. The sampling technique used consecutive sampling technique and obtained a sample of 60 people. The data was analyzed by using chi-square test for comparison of FOUR score and BSS in determining the prognosis of severe head injury patient at RSUD Gambiran Kediri. Based on the results of study by chi-square test showed that p FOUR score = p BSS = 0,004, which meant the FOUR score and BSS was determined the prognosis of patients with severe traumatic head injury at RSUD Gambiran Kediri. The study showed that there was no difference between the FOUR score and BSS in determining the prognosis of severe head injury patient at RSUD Gambiran Kediri but FOUR score could be used in incubated or ventilated patients. Based on the results of this study, it is advisable to use scoring method more easily and according to the condition of the patient is with the installed ventilator or non ventilator.
References
Bordini, A.L., Luiz, T.F., Fernandez, M., Arruda, W.O., Teive, H.A.G. (2010). Coma scales : A historical review. Arq Neurosiquiart, 68 (May) : 930 – 7.
Dewan, M.C., et al . (2019). Estimating the Global Incidence of Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Neurosurgery (130) : 1080-1097
Dewi, R, Irawan, M, Irene Y. (2011). Perbandingan Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score dengan Glasgow Coma Scale dalam Menentukan Prognostik Pasien Sakit Kritis. Sari Pediatri, Vol. 13 No. 3, 215-220.
Gorji, M.A.H, Seyed, H.H, Gholipur, A, Mohammadpur, R.A. (2016). A Comparison of The Diagnostic Power of The Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Scale and The Glasgow Coma Scale in The Discharge Outcome Prediction of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Admitted to The Intensive Care Unit. Saudi Journal of Anesthesia, Vol. 8, Issue 2, 193 – 197.
Iavagnilio, C.L. (2011). Traumatic brain injury : improving the patient’s outcome demands timely and accurate diagnosis. Journal of Legal Nurse Consuling, 22 (3) : 3-9.
Jennett B, Teasdale G, Braakman R, et al. (1979). Prognosis of patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery, 4 : 282-9.
Matoha, J, Eko, P, Maximillian, Ch. O. (2016). Hubungan Antara Skala Skor FOUR dan CT Marshall dengan Penilaian GCS pada Penderita Cedera Otak Akibat Trauma. Jurnal Biomedik (JBM),8(3), 192-196.
Murthy TVSD. (2009). A new score to validate coma in emergency department-FOUR score. IJNT;6:59-62.
Nair, S.S., Surendran, A., Prabhakar, R.B., Christhi, M.M. (2017). Comparison between FOUR score and GCS in assessing patients with traumatic head injury : A tertiary centre study. Int Surg J, 4 (2) : 656
Nurhayati, E, Achmad, S, Sasmiyanto. (2013). Pengaruh Pemberian Infus Dingin Terhadap Penurunan Suhu Pada Pasien Cidera Otak Di RSD dr. Soebandi Jember. Jember: The Indonesian journal of health science, 3(2), 161 – 167.
Obiako, O.R, Ogunniyi, A. (2010). The Glasgow Coma Scale and Brainstem Signs Score : Which is Better of Coma Outcome in Acute Stroke. Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, 1(9), 395 – 400.
Okasha, A.S., Fayed, A.M., Saleh, A.S. (2014). The FOUR score predicts mortality, endotracheal intubation and ICU length of stay after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit. Care, 21 : 496 - 504
Ozoilo, K.N. (2012). Measurement of the magnitude of injury : A review of the trauma scoring system. Jos J Med, 6 (2) : 19 - 26
Pamungkas, Didik. (2015). Hubungan Antara Revised Trauma Score dengan Angka Mortalitas Pada Pasien Cedera Kepala di RSUD DR Moewardi Surakarta. Skripsi. Naskah di Publikasikan. S1 Keperawatan SekolahTinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Surakarta: Jawa Tengah.
Reginald, O.O., & Adesola, O. (2010). The Glasgow coma scale and brainstem signs score: which is a better predictor of coma outcome in acute stroke?. Semanticscholar.
Stead LG, Wijdicks EFM, Bhagra A, Kashyap R, Bellolio MF, Nash DL, dkk. (2009). Validation of a new coma scale, the FOUR score, in the emergency department. Neurocrit Care;10:50-4.
Turgeon, A. F., Lauzier, F., Zarychanski, R., et al. (2017). Prognostication in Critically Ill Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury : The TBI-Prognosis Multicentre Feasibility Study. BMJ Open (7), 1-7.
Wijdicks, E, Bamlet WR. Maramatton, B.V, Manno,E.M, McClelland, R.L. (2005). Validation of a New Coma Scale : The FOUR score. American Neurological Association, 58(4), 585-593.
